Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
61
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
100
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 61 Stable Stable Watch
2022 64 Stable Stable Watch
2021 59 Fragile Recovery
2020 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 61 Stable Stable Watch
2017 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 61 Stable Stable Watch
2014 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 57 Fragile Recovery
2012 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 53 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Yulia Shcherbakova Board President
Kim Gangloff Board President
Amy H Christopher Treasurer
Stacy Sirois Secretary
Jacqueline Goodrich Historian
Lucy Smith Board Member
Karen Gonzales Board Member
Christopher Gangloff Board Member
Samantha Moody Board Member
Anna Jackson Board Member
Shelbie Baird Board Member
Steve Davis Board Member
Molly Baldridge Board Member
Susan McCoy Board Member
Sharyn Rogers Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
100 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
61 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 65 points above the peer median (100 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 53 → 61 over 5 years (improving by 8 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.