Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2023 61 Stable Stable Watch
2022 60 Stable Stable Watch
2021 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 64 Stable Stable Watch
2019 61 Stable Stable Watch
2018 61 Stable Stable Watch
2017 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 57 Fragile Recovery
2015 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SHARRON MATHEWS Board Member
MELINDA KEBERLE Treasurer
BRIAN MCCANN Board Member
KEVIN BERKOMPAS Board President
CAMERON LAPLANTE Board Member
CLARK BREKKE Board President
KATELYN ORCHARD Board Member
DON GOODWIN Board Member
LISA PRICE Board Member
ROD PRICE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LIESEL KITTLITZ Board Member
DANIEL KEBERLE Board Member
DON GOODWIN Board Member
CRAIG LANDRON Board Member
LISA PRICE Board Member
ROD PRICE Board Member
MASON BURLEY Board Member
MELINDA KEBERLE Treasurer
BRIAN MCCANN Board Member
KEVIN BERKOMPAS Board President
BAILEY NOBLE Board Member
CLARK BREKKE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 235 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 9 points above the peer median (50 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 64 → 45 over 5 years (declining by 19 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.