Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 10.3% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 6.3% 54 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 14.6% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 12.7% 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 15.7% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 3.6% 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — 5.7% 54 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — 14.5% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2015 — — 15.8% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2014 — — 27.4% 39 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2013 — — 12.6% 50 Fragile Gov Risk
2012 — — 3.9% 55 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 10.3% 56 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIAN RANKIN EXECUTIVE DI 11.7% of Rev
KELLY LUCAS Board President —
MALCOLM WHITE VICE PRESIDE —
SHANE LOPER Treasurer —
LISA BRADELY Secretary —
JULIE CWIKLA EX-OFFICIO —
CHARLES BARBER Board Member —
COURTNEY BLOSSMAN Board Member —
JAMIE DENT Board Member —
DAVID DUHE Board Member —
MARK EVERSON Board Member —
ANGELA NATION Board Member —
ROBERT ST JOHN Board Member —
DAVID ALLEN Board Member —
HALEY MARTIN Board Member —
MATTHEW MAYFIELD Board Member —
SUE NGUYEN TORJUSEN Board Member —
KELSEY SUNDERMAN FOSTER Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIAN RANKIN EXECUTIVE DI 9.8% of Rev
STEPHANIE BARTHES Secretary —
COURTNEY BLOSSMAN Board Member —
CATHY CHANDLER Board Member —
JOE CLOYD Board Member —
JULIE CWIKLA VICE PRESIDE —
NATALIE DANON Board Member —
MIKE DAVIS Board Member —
JAMIE DENT Treasurer —
DAVID DUHE Board Member —
KELLY LUCAS Board Member —
JENNY NICAUD Board Member —
PAIGE RILEY Board Member —
MISTY SHAW-FEDER Board President —
RICH WESTFALL Board Member —
HANK ZUBER Board Member —
VICKI APPLEWHITE Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIAN RANKIN EXECUTIVE DI 11.2% of Rev
VICKI APPLEWHITE Board President —
STEPHANIE BARTHES Board Member —
COURTNEY BLOSSMAN Board Member —
CATHY CHANDLER Board Member —
JOE CLOYD Board Member —
JULIE CWIKLA Board Member —
MIKE DAVIS Board Member —
HEATHER RATLIFF DENISON Board Member —
JAMIE DENT Treasurer —
DAVID DUHE Board Member —
KELLY LUCAS Board Member —
JENNY NICAUD Board Member —
PAIGE RILEY Board Member —
MISTY SHAW-FEDER Secretary —
GERMAINE WELDON Board Member —
RICH WESTFALL VICE PRESIDE —
HANK ZUBER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIAN RANKIN EXECUTIVE DI 9.9% of Rev
VICKI APPLEWHITE Board Member —
STEPHANIE BARTHES Board Member —
COURTNEY BLOSSMAN Board Member —
CATHY CHANDLER Board Member —
JOE CLOYD Board Member —
JULIE CWIKLA Board Member —
MIKE DAVIS Board Member —
HEATHER RATLIFF DENISON Board Member —
JAMIE DENT Treasurer —
DAVID DUHE Board Member —
KELLY LUCAS Board Member —
JENNY NICAUD Board Member —
PAIGE RILEY Secretary —
MISTY SHAW-FEDER VICE PRESIDE —
GERMAINE WELDON Board Member —
RICH WESTFALL Board President —
HANK ZUBER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 30 other orgs in MS with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points below the peer median (40 vs. 77).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.