Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
46
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2022 Hidden Hidden 5.2% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — 4.2% 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 10.2% 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 — — 7.5% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 4.7% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 5.1% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 4.4% 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 2.8% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — 4.4% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — 4.8% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — 4.6% 55 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 5.6% 50 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sarah Williams Executive Director 2.6% of Rev
Eric Ting Artistic Director 1.8% of Rev
Clive Worsley Board Member 0.7% of Rev
Kate Stechschulte Board President —
Jeff Bharkhda Treasurer —
Betsy Streeter Secretary —
Jeannie Simpson Board President —
Tracy Walthall Board President —
Valerie Barth Board Member —
Maureen O'Keefe Board Member —
Alex Busansky Board Member —
Michael Cedars Board Member —
Phil Chernin Board Member —
Joshua Cohen Board Member —
John Collins Board Member —
Tish Harwood Board Member —
James Roethe Board Member —
John Ruskin Board Member —
Jay Yamada Board Member —
Nina Rastogi Board Member —
Mark Toney Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Eric Ting Artistic Director 2.4% of Rev
Shailendra Agarwal Treasurer 2.4% of Rev
Sarah Williams Executive Director 2.3% of Rev
Tirzah Tyler Executive Director 0.2% of Rev
Kate Stechschulte Board President —
Jeff Bharkhda Treasurer —
Betsy Streeter Secretary —
Jean Simpson Board President —
Ellen Dale Board President —
Valerie Barth Board Member —
Cristina Bensadoun Board Member —
Alex Busansky Board Member —
Mike Cedars Board Member —
Phil Chernin Board Member —
Mike Cleland Board Member —
Joshua Cohen Board Member —
John Collins Board Member —
Tish Harwood Board Member —
James Roethe Board Member —
John Ruskin Board Member —
Jay Yamada Board Member —
Sharon Simpson Board Member —
Tracey Walthall Board Member —
Mark W Toney Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Eric Ting Artistic Director 2.4% of Rev
Shailendra Agarwal Treasurer 2.4% of Rev
Sarah Williams Executive Director 2.3% of Rev
Tirzah Tyler Executive Director 0.2% of Rev
Kate Stechschulte Board President —
Jeff Bharkhda Treasurer —
Betsy Streeter Secretary —
Jean Simpson Board President —
Ellen Dale Board President —
Valerie Barth Board Member —
Cristina Bensadoun Board Member —
Alex Busansky Board Member —
Mike Cedars Board Member —
Phil Chernin Board Member —
Mike Cleland Board Member —
Joshua Cohen Board Member —
John Collins Board Member —
Tish Harwood Board Member —
James Roethe Board Member —
John Ruskin Board Member —
Jay Yamada Board Member —
Sharon Simpson Board Member —
Tracey Walthall Board Member —
Mark W Toney Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,425 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.