Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
19
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 64.0% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 24.4% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 62.7% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 17.0% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 10.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 49 Fragile Recovery
2013 47 Fragile Recovery
2012 45 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WENDY NORRIS Executive Director 22.9% of Rev
JESSICA MOREL Board Member 13.7% of Rev
ADRIENNE WALSH Board Member 0.2% of Rev
DAVID DEFREESE Board President
YANTO MULIADI Treasurer
TERESA MARRIN NAKRA Secretary
FRANCISCO CERVANTES Board Member
SUNNY CHEN Board Member
MICHAEL DONAHUE Board Member
DEENA GRAFFEO WEEKS Board Member
CAREY HWANG Board Member
RICH MCLAUGHLIN Board Member
ULI SPETH Board Member
ABDU SJAMSU Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WENDY NORRIS Executive Director 9.1% of Rev
SUNNY CHEN Board Member
MICHAEL DONAHUE Board Member
CAREY HWANG Board Member
ANDI SJAMSU Board Member
ULI SPETH Board Member
ADRIENNE WALSH Board Member
DAVID A DEFREESE Board President
TERESA MARRIN NAKRA Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FRANCES BLUM Executive Director 9.3% of Rev
ADRIENNE WALSH Treasurer
ANDI SJAMSU Board Member
CAREY HWANG Board Member
DAVID DEFREESE Board President
MICHAEL DONAHUE Board Member
RICHARD BILOTTI Board President
ULI SPETH Board Member
SUNNY CHEN Board Member
TERESA NAKRA Board Member
WENDY NORRIS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
19 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 176 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 29 points below the peer median (5 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

Overall score has gone from 29 → 19 over 5 years (declining by 10 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 64.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.