Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 15.0% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 16.8% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 13.0% 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 9.1% 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 9.6% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 14.7% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 11.4% 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 8.6% 50 Fragile Recovery
2015 53 Fragile Recovery
2014 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 49 Fragile Recovery
2012 30.7% 38 Fragile Gov Risk
2011 16.8% 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DONNA SWAJESKI Board President 13.8% of Rev
DOUG HOTMER Board Member
DAVID SWAJESKI Board President
MICHAEL OPELKA Secretary
GARY WATSON Board Member
ANDREW PEACH Secretary
ANA MARTINS AT-LARGE
CHRIS ORAZI AT-LARGE

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DONNA SWAJESKI Board President 12.5% of Rev
DONNA SWAJESKI Board President 10.5% of Rev
DOUG HOTMER Secretary
DAVID SWAJESKI Board President
MICHAEL OPELKA Board Member
GARY WATSON Board Member
ANDREW PEACH Secretary
DOUG HOTMER Secretary
DAVID SWAJESKI Board President
MICHAEL OPELKA Board Member
GARY WATSON Board Member
ANDREW PEACH Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 23 other orgs in DE with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 6 points below the peer median (30 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

Overall score has gone from 40 → 39 over 5 years (declining by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.