Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 41 Fragile Recovery
2022 30.8% 38 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 13.9% 49 Fragile Recovery
2020 11.6% 49 Fragile Recovery
2019 49.2% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 43.4% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 45.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 50.7% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 50.0% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 60.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 53.8% 35 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2012 73.6% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2011 40.9% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
JULIE PARSONS Board President
LINDA MARTINEZ Secretary
JOE DENOYER Board President
SHIRLEY SCOTT Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
JULIE PARSONS Board President
LINDA MARTINEZ Secretary
JOE DENOYER Board President
SHIRELY SCOTT Treasurer
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
JULIE PARSONS Board President
LINDA MARTINEZ Secretary
JOE DENOYER Board President
SHIRELY SCOTT Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 21 other orgs in KS with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 6 points above the peer median (40 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.