Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | — | — | — | 50 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 56 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 53 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 57 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 65 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 57 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARK MCCOLLUM | Board Member | — | ||
| BILL M MORRIS | Board Member | — | ||
| CONNIE THURMAN | Board Member | — | ||
| ALYSON SMITH | SECTY/BDMEMB | — | ||
| GWYN BIRK | Treasurer | — | ||
| KIM SNARE | Board Member | — | ||
| MICAH MILLER | THEATRE MGR. | — | ||
| BILL A MORRIS SR | Board Member | — | ||
| SHANE SCOTT | Board Member | — | ||
| BOB BAUGHER | Board Member | — | ||
| MARK MCCOLLUM | Board Member | — | ||
| BILL M MORRIS | Board Member | — | ||
| CONNIE THURMAN | Board Member | — | ||
| ALYSON SMITH | SECTY/BDMEMB | — | ||
| GWYN BIRK | Treasurer | — | ||
| KIM SNARE | Board Member | — | ||
| MICAH MILLER | THEATRE MGR. | — | ||
| BILL A MORRIS SR | Board Member | — | ||
| SHANE SCOTT | Board Member | — | ||
| BOB BAUGHER | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 21 other orgs in KS with NTEE prefix A2.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 32 points above the peer median (65 vs. 33).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 61 → 50 over 5 years (declining by 11 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.
What's driving this score
- No individual risk drivers stand out. Overall score reflects component balance, not any single signal.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.