Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation ↑
Overall
45
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 2.8% 45 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 — — 2.5% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 2.5% 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 2.0% 49 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 2.8% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 0.3% 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 3.5% 45 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 2.5% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — 3.1% 45 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 6.3% 40 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 — — 7.9% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — 8.2% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARGARET WEISBROD MORRIS Executive Director 2.8% of Rev
MEREDITH LANG Board President —
RYANN GALLOWAY TACHA Board President —
ASHLEY ALL Board President —
STEPHEN GISH Treasurer —
KEVIN WICKLIFFE Secretary —
WHITNEY LANG Board President —
THOMAS HUANG Board Member —
ISABEL JOHNSON Board Member —
SARAH KURIEN Board Member —
AMY LEE Board Member —
FRANK LEMUS Board Member —
LORI NORWOOD Board Member —
JEREMY PHILLIP Board Member —
MARGIE WAKEFIELD Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARGARET WEISBROD MORRIS Executive Director 2.6% of Rev
THOMAS HUANG Board Member 0.0% of Rev
STEPHEN GISH Treasurer —
CHRIS ENGLISH Board President —
ASHLEY ALL Board Member —
JEVAN BREMBY Board Member —
PAT BROWN Board Member —
RON GACHES Board Member —
ISABEL JOHNSON Board Member —
MEREDITH LANG Board Member —
DALTON PALEY Board Member —
MARGIE WAKEFIELD Board President —
WHITNEY LANG Board President —
RYANN GALLOWAY TACHA Secretary —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARGRET WEISBROD MORRIS Executive Director 2.8% of Rev
ASHLEY ALL Board Member —
WHITNEY LANG Board Member —
RYANN GALLOWAY TACHA Board Member —
DON BUCHNER Board Member —
STEPHEN GISH Board Member —
JOSHUA FALLEAF Board Member —
ISABEL JOHNSON Board Member —
RON GACHES Secretary —
DAVID HOLLOND Treasurer —
CLARE DOVETON Board Member —
CHRIS ENGLISH Chairman —
DALTON PALEY Board Member —
CINDY MAUDE Board Member —
MARGIE WAKEFIELD Board President —
PAT BROWN Board Member —
THOMAS HUANG Board Member —
HONG ZHANG Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARGRET WEISBROD MORRIS Executive Director 2.8% of Rev
ASHLEY ALL Board Member —
WHITNEY LANG Board Member —
RYANN GALLOWAY TACHA Board Member —
DON BUCHNER Board Member —
STEPHEN GISH Board Member —
JOSHUA FALLEAF Board Member —
ISABEL JOHNSON Board Member —
RON GACHES Secretary —
DAVID HOLLOND Treasurer —
CLARE DOVETON Chairman —
CHRIS ENGLISH Board President —
DALTON PALEY Board Member —
CINDY MAUDE Board Member —
MARGIE WAKEFIELD Board Member —
HONG ZHANG Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 38 other orgs in KS with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.