Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
22
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2020 22 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Darius Cotton Executive Director
Robert Blumenfeld Chairman
Sheri Keljo Treasurer
Victoria McCuller Board Member
Russell Kudela Board Member

Tax year 2020

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 12.0% of Rev

Tax year 2019

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 12.8% of Rev

Tax year 2018

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 10.4% of Rev

Tax year 2017

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 14.6% of Rev

Tax year 2016

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 46.4% of Rev
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
22 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in MI for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 19 → 22 over 5 years (improving by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.