Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 41 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — — 41 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BILL ALLISON Board Member —
MAGEN ALLRED Board Member —
ASAMI FLOYD Board Member —
NORT HARRISON Secretary —
MORT HILL Board Member —
SARAH JACKSON Board Member —
STEVE JACKSON Board President —
BILL TALLENT JR Treasurer —
BLAINE MARTIN Board Member —
PETER MAYNARD Board Member —
MARK MOORE Board President —
JEFF TENHUNDFELD Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVE JACKSON Board President —
BILL TALLENT JR Treasurer —
NORT HARRISON Secretary —
ASAMI FLOYD Board Member —
MORT HILL Board Member —
BILL ALLISON Board Member —
SARAH JACKSON Board Member —
JEFF TENHUNDFELD Board Member —
BLAINE MARTIN Board Member —
MARK MOORE Board President —
MAGEN ALLRED Board Member —
PETER MAYNARD Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 130 other orgs in TN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 23 points below the peer median (50 vs. 73).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.