Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
24
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 18.4% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 16.6% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 7.1% 40 Fragile Recovery
2020 5.1% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 8.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHELSEA D BRAVERMAN Board President 14.3% of Rev
ANNE SOLKOW Secretary 2.0% of Rev
ALEX JACOBS Treasurer 1.4% of Rev
JUSTIN D BRAVERMAN Board Member
ABBY CHRISTENSEN Board Member
WENDY BOWMAN Board Member
NICKI PRESBY Board Member
DARRYL C SHEETZ Board Member
JUSTIN HOFFMAN BOARD MEMEBER

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHELSEA D BRAVERMAN Board President 15.5% of Rev
ANNE SOLKOW Secretary 2.2% of Rev
DARRYL C SHEETZ Board Member 0.4% of Rev
WENDY BOWMAN Board Member
NICKI PRESBY Board Member
JUSTIN D BRAVERMAN Board Member
ABBY CHRISTENSEN Board Member
JUSTIN HOFFMAN BOARD MEMEBER
ALEX JACOBS Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHELSEA D BRAVERMAN Board President 1.6% of Rev
DARRYL C SHEETZ Board Member 0.7% of Rev
ANNE SOLKOW Secretary 0.4% of Rev
WENDY BOWMAN Board Member
NICKI PRESBY Board Member
JUSTIN D BRAVERMAN Board Member
ABBY CHRISTENSEN Board Member
JUSTIN HOFFMAN BOARD MEMEBER
ALEX JACOBS Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
24 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points below the peer median (5 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.