Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
44
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 44 Fragile Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 8.9% 40 Fragile Recovery
2019 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AERA RHO Board President
YIJIN YU TREASURY
ZHILIANG YU Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ZHILIANG YU Board Member 17.5% of Rev
YIJIN YU TREASURY 3.0% of Rev
KELLY YU Board President
YIJIN YU TREASURY
ZHILIANG YU Board Member
KELLY YU Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in NY for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.