Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
40
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2023 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 46 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
COLBY BLOCK Board President
BEVERLY MITCHELL Board President
JOHN SCHWERI Treasurer
JOYCE BLACKBURN Board Member
SUSAN POBST Secretary
KIM RANDELL Board Member
ED CAMPBELL Board Member
DYLAN CROWELL Board Member
TAMERA GREEN Board Member
CHRISTIAN RANDELL Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CURTIS BUTLER Board President
BEVERLY MITCHELL Board President
THOMAS HUGHES Treasurer
TIANNA COTTON Secretary
COLBY BLOCK Board Member
NANETTE M EKIMOGLOY Board Member
ROXANNE HAMILTON Board Member
JOHN SCHWERI Board Member
ABBY WADDOUPS Board Member
CURTIS BUTLER Board President
BEVERLY MITCHELL Board President
JOHN SCHWERI Treasurer
JESSICA EVANS Secretary
COLBY BLOCK Board Member
JERRY HENDERSON Board Member
NIKOHL ALSUP Board Member
SUSAN POBST Board Member
ROXIE SNOW GIPSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 45 other orgs in TN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 8 points below the peer median (30 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.