Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
36
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 6.1% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTIANA MCGORRY Board Member 6.1% of Rev
CRAIG STEVENS VICE PRESIDE
ANN BIBBEE Treasurer
NATALIE CARROLL Board President
SHARI DEVLIN Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
THOMAS LEARY Board President
EMILY CHILDS Board President
ELISABETH NTOLO Treasurer
SERPIL UNVER Board Member
KITTY MCGORRY Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in VA for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.