Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | — | — | 17.9% | 42 | Governance-Stressed | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 47 | Financially Distressed | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 48 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 39 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARCELO PEREIRA | Board Member | — | ||
| RODNEY JACKSON JR | Board Member | — | ||
| MARTINA ROGERS | Board Member | — | ||
| MECCA BILLINGS | Board Member | — | ||
| NICOLA BOSCO-ALVAREZ | Board Member | — | ||
| ELIZABETH ROBERTS | Board Member | — | ||
| JOANNE COHEN | Board Member | — | ||
| KATE STOIA | Treasurer | — | ||
| BRIAN BELL | Board Member | — | ||
| LILLIAN KIM MURPHY | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARCELO JAVIER PEREIRA | Board Member | — | ||
| RODNEY EARL JACKSON JR | Board Member | — | ||
| MARTINA ROGERS | Board Member | — | ||
| MECCA BILLINGS | Board Member | — | ||
| NICOLA BOSCO-ALVAREZ | Board Member | — | ||
| ELISABETH ROBERTS | Board Member | — | ||
| JOANNE COHEN | Board Member | — | ||
| KATE STOIA | Board Member | — | ||
| BRIAN BELL | Board Member | — | ||
| LILLIAN KIM MURPHY | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 39 → 42 over 5 years (improving by 3 points).
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 17.9% sits within the sector's healthy band (18–22%).
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.