Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 51 Fragile Recovery
2018 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHEN MCCOY Executive Director 42.7% of Rev
STEPHEN MCCOY Executive Director 31.4% of Rev
GREG SANDERS Artistic Director 21.1% of Rev
GREG SANDERS Artistic Director 18.1% of Rev
CLINT MCCURRY Board President
CHAD KEPNER Treasurer
ZACHARY BLATZ Secretary
JERICO HUGHES Board President
TIM BIRKY Board President
CLINT MCCURRY Board President
CHAD KEPNER Treasurer
ZACHARY BLATZ Secretary
GREG SANDERS Artistic Director
STEVE HAMILTON Board President
CHAD KEPNER Treasurer
ELIZABETH KLIMES Secretary
PARISA MANSOORI Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Colton Withers Board President
Tim Birky Board President
Zachary Blatz Treasurer
Matthew Creek Board Member
George Hanlin Board Member
Elizabeth Klimes Board Member
Donna Mann Board Member
Clint McCurry Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 120 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 10 points above the peer median (50 vs. 40).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.