Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↑
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 13.6% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 8.4% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 9.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 8.5% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — 6.1% 54 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 9.2% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — 8.6% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — 7.3% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — 4.2% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — 2.9% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — 4.3% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — 6.1% 54 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 28.2% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN CLEMENT Artistic Director 14.7% of Rev
JANNETTE DAVIS Board Member —
MADDY MAGEE Board Member —
SARA FOXLEY Board Member —
SUSAN CLEMENT Board Member —
SARA MCCLURE Secretary —
ROBERT PETERS Treasurer —
JIM MCKAIN Board Member —
LAURA PEETE ERKES Board President —
DEVIN FOX MD Board Member —
ETHAN BONDELID Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN CLEMENT Artistic Director 13.6% of Rev
JANNETTE DAVIS Board Member —
MIKE WALENTA Board Member —
SARA FOXLEY Board Member —
SUSAN CLEMENT Board Member —
SARA MCCLURE Board Member —
ROBERT PETERS Treasurer —
JIM MCKAIN Board Member —
LAURA PEETE ERKES Secretary —
DEVIN FOX MD Board President —
ETHAN BONDELID Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANNETTE DAVIS Board Member —
MIKE WALENTA Board Member —
SARA FOXLEY Board Member —
SUSAN CLEMENT Board Member —
SARA MCCLURE Board Member —
MARK HINRICHS Board Member —
KASEY HESSE Secretary —
ROBERT PETERS Treasurer —
JIM MCKAIN Board Member —
LAURA PEETE ERKES Board Member —
DEVIN FOX MD Board President —
ETHAN BONDELID Board Member —
SUSAN CLEMENT Artistic Director —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN CLEMENT Artistic Director 12.7% of Rev
JANNETTE DAVIS Board Member —
CAROLYN ANDERSON Board Member —
SARA FOXLEY Board Member —
SUSAN CLEMENT Board Member —
SARA MCCLURE Board Member —
MARK HINRICHS Board Member —
KASEY HESSE Secretary —
ROBERT PETERS Treasurer —
JIM MCKAIN Board Member —
LAURA PEETE ERKES Board Member —
DEVIN FOX MD Board President —
ETHAN BONDELID Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN CLEMENT TOBERER Artistic Director 12.4% of Rev
JANNETTE DAVIS Board Member —
CAROLYN ANDERSON Board Member —
SARA FOXLEY Board Member —
SUSAN CLEMENT-TOBERER Board Member —
SARA MCCLURE Board Member —
MARK HINRICHS Board Member —
KASEY HESSE Secretary —
ROBERT PETERS Treasurer —
JIM MCKAIN Board Member —
ARIEL ROBLIN Board Member —
DEVIN FOX MD Board President —
ETHAN BONDELID Board Member —
MIKE WALENTA Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 50 other orgs in NE with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.