Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 8.8% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 5.2% 54 Fragile Recovery
2021 Hidden Hidden 9.7% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — 7.5% 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 10.9% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — 8.1% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 6.7% 54 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 13.6% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — 9.0% 50 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — 15.5% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 10.8% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 — — 13.4% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — 7.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRIS COOK Executive Director 8.1% of Rev
AARON SHADDY Board Member —
RODRIGO VALENZUELA Board Member —
TODD SIMON Board President —
TOM SIMMS Board President —
CHRIS RUSSELL Treasurer —
MARCIA KERRIGAN Secretary —
ARUN AGARWAL Board Member —
BRIAN BARTELS Board Member —
LILI CHENG Board Member —
ROBERT DUNCAN Board Member —
MARCUS FISCHER Board Member —
DEVIN FOX Board Member —
NANCY FRIEDMANN-SANCHEZ Board Member —
EMILIANO LERDA Board Member —
LEE EMMA RUNNING Board Member —
POLINA SCHLOTT Board Member —
JOAQUIN SEGURA Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRIS COOK Executive Director 7.3% of Rev
VICTORIA MACLIN MD Board President —
RICHARD VIERK Board President —
TODD SIMON Board President —
MICHAEL J SMITH II Treasurer —
DEANNA VIARS BOSSELMAN Secretary —
ARUN AGARWAL Board Member —
THOMAS SIMMS Board Member —
LILI CHENG Board Member —
ROBERT DUNCAN Board Member —
NANCY FRIEDEMANN-SANCHEZ Board Member —
JEFF GORDMAN Board Member —
LAWRENCE JAMES Board Member —
MARY MATTINGLY Board Member —
GIGI O'HARA Board Member —
KAMBUI OLUJIMI Board Member —
JOAQUIN SEGURA Board Member —
RODRIGO VALENZUELA Board Member —
WATIE WHITE Board Member —
LARRY LUNDQUIST Board Member —
LEE EMA RUNNING Board Member —
CHRIS RUSSELL Board Member —
POLINA SCHLOTT Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRIS COOK Executive Director 7.8% of Rev
AILEEN TOBIN Board Member 4.6% of Rev
VICTORIA MACLIN MD Board President —
RICHARD VIERK Board President —
TODD SIMON Board President —
MICHAEL J SMITH II Treasurer —
ALEXANDRA GRANT Secretary —
ARUN AGARWAL Board Member —
DEANNA VIARS BOSSELMAN Board Member —
LILI CHENG Board Member —
ROBERT DUNCAN Board Member —
NANCY FRIEDEMANN-SANCHEZ Board Member —
JEFF GORDMAN Board Member —
LAWRENCE JAMES Board Member —
EMILIANO LERDA Board Member —
MARY MATTINGLY Board Member —
GIGI O'HARA Board Member —
KAMBUI OLUJIMI Board Member —
TYLER OWEN Board Member —
GREG SCHNACKEL Board Member —
PAUL SMITH Board Member —
RODRIGO VALENZUELA Board Member —
WATIE WHITE Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 10 other orgs in NE with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 30 points below the peer median (40 vs. 70).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.