Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
41
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 28.7% 41 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 17.1% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 18.0% 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHRYN FRADY MARVEL Board Member 28.7% of Rev
APRIL HILL Board President
ANGIE LUCKIE Secretary
SCOTT JAMISON Board Member
JACOB LOVE Board Member
GREG SHERRILL GOVERNANCE C
SUSAN HERRERA Board Member
HOLLY HAMBRIGHT Board Member
SHEENA MCALL Board Member
STANTON WEBSTER Board President
JEFF ARBITAL Board Member
TAYLOR COLTON STONE Board Member
CHRIS WEATERS Board Member
EMILY CHANG Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHRYN FRADY Board Member 16.3% of Rev
JERROLD BECKER Board President
KIMBERLY HENRY Board President
DOMINICK WHITE Board Member
JAMES MARVEL Board President
APRIL HILL Treasurer
ANGIE LUCKIE Secretary
SCOTT JAMISON Board Member
SHEENA MCCALL Board Member
TOM FINE Board Member
PATRICIA MAFFEO Board Member
FRANK MURPHY Board Member
JACOB LOVE Board Member
TYLER JANOW DEVELOPMENT
MARY MORRIS Board Member
TONY DEATON Board Member
GREG SHERRILL GOVERNANCE C
SUSAN HERRERA Board Member
SAVANNAH SCHULTZ Board Member
DAVID CRAWFORD Board Member
JUDY COLLINS Board Member
MICHELLE CLAYTON Board Member
JOSH PURVIS Board Member
CHRIS WEATERS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHRYN FRADY Board Member 14.3% of Rev
MARDEL FEHRENBACK Board President
JERROLD BECKER Board President
KIMBERLY HENRY Board President
DOMINICK WHITE Board Member
JOE TRAHERN Board Member
JAMES MARVEL Board Member
MICHAEL TORANO Secretary
CHISSY KEUPER Board Member
SHEENA MCCALL Board Member
TOM FINE Board Member
PATRICIA MAFFEO Board Member
APRIL HILL Treasurer
FRANK MURPHY Board Member
JACOB LOVE Board Member
DELORES ZIEGLER Board Member
MARY MORRIS Board Member
MICHAEL COMBS Board Member
VICTOR CHAVEZ Board Member
GREG SHERRILL Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 45 other orgs in TN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 18 points above the peer median (55 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 28.7% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~13 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.