Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 52 Fragile Recovery
2020 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 47 Fragile Recovery
2016 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Artie Ferrell Board President
Jack Strite Board President
Deborah Pfau Secretary
Luma Green Treasurer
Dee Loge-Wacker Board Member
Greg Senholzi Board Member
Bonnie Williams Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
William Davis Board President
Susan Davis Board President
Jo Ann Hanebrink Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
William Davis Board President
Susan Davis Board President
Jo Ann Hanebrink Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 244 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 35 points above the peer median (65 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.