Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
59
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
100
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 59 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 8.9% 54 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 45.9% 45 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 17.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 13.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 18.2% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JESSICA WALLIS Board Member 17.6% of Rev
ELIZABETH LEWIS Secretary
CATHERINE WISEMAN HAKES Board President
PHILIP MUNCH Treasurer
ROBERTA DEPOMPEI Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JESSICA WALLIS Board Member 3.9% of Rev
ELIZABETH LEWIS Secretary
PENELOPE RAMPERSAD Board Member
CATHERINE WISEMAN HAKES Board President
PHILIP MUNCH Treasurer
ROBERTA DEPOMPEI Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JESSICA WALLIS Board Member 26.7% of Rev
ELIZABETH LEWIS Secretary
PENELOPE RAMPERSAD Board Member
KATHERINE KELLY Board Member
CATHERINE WISEMAN HAKES Board President
PHILIP MUNCH Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
100 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
59 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 212 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 59 points above the peer median (100 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.