Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
57
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 8.4% 59 Fragile Recovery
2021 14.8% 57 Fragile Recovery
2020 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 45 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBIN WILLIAMS EXECUTIVE DI 8.5% of Rev
JIM CRIPE Board President
BARBARA MAYFIELD VICE PRESIDE
SHANNON TELFER Treasurer
QUIANA SANDORA Secretary
ALLEN HUFF Board Member
CHRIS WAYMIRE Board Member
JAY DENNISON Board Member
EVAN MAXWELL Board Member
INGER COWAN Board Member
GWEN FLORA Board Member
CESAR CERVANTES Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBIN WILLIAMS EXECUTIVE DI 8.5% of Rev
JIM CRIPE Board President
SHELLEY LOWENBERG-DEBOER VICE PRESIDE
SHANNON TELFER Treasurer
QUIANA SANDORA Secretary
ALLEN HUFF Board Member
CHRIS WAYMIRE Board Member
SARA DALY BROSMAN Board Member
JAY DENNISON Board Member
BARB MAYFIELD Board Member
EVAN MAXWELL Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
57 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 120 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 40 points above the peer median (80 vs. 40).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 45 → 57 over 5 years (improving by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.