Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
21
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2021 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 20.7% 20 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 51.8% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 26.5% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 353.6% 16 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 19.3% 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SCARLET MARESSA RIVERA Treasurer
NOLAN KENNEDY DECK CAPTAIN
WELLAND H SCRIPPS Board President
DEBRA BRENMAN Board Member
STEVEN BRENMAN Board President
GLEN STISKAL Board Member
LYNDE ROSARIO Secretary
MICKEY PALMS Board Member
MELISSA GEORGES Board Member
CHRISTOPHER GILLARD Board Member
JOHANNA SCHMITT Board Member
KENNY CHUNG Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SCARLET MARESSA RIVERA Treasurer
NOLAN KENNEDY DECK CAPTAIN
WELLAND H SCRIPPS Board President
DEBRA BRENMAN Board Member
STEVEN BRENMAN Board President
GLEN STISKAL Board Member
LYNDE ROSARIO Secretary
MICKEY PALMS Board Member
MELISSA GEORGES Board Member
CHRISTOPHER GILLARD Board Member
JOHANNA SCHMITT Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
21 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 26 points below the peer median (5 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 22 → 21 over 5 years (declining by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.