Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
53
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 53 Fragile Recovery
2022 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 44 Fragile Recovery
2020 38 Fragile Recovery
2019 52 Fragile Recovery
2017 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LAURA VELKEI Board Member
GABRIELLE NEWMARK Secretary
HARLEY CROSS Board Member
TIMOTHY KREHBIEL Board Member
YUVAL BAR-ZEMER Treasurer
DAVID CERWONKA Board Member
TODD TERRAZAS Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TODD TERRAZAS Board President
LAURA VELKEI Board Member
GABRIELLE NEWMARK Secretary
HARLEY CROSS Board Member
TIMOTHY KREHBIEL Board Member
YUVAL BAR-ZEMER Treasurer
DAVID CERWONKA Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TODD TERRAZAS Board President
LAURA VELKEI Board Member
GABRIELLE NEWMARK Secretary
HARLEY CROSS Board Member
TIMOTHY KREHBIEL Board Member
YUVAL BAR-ZEMER Treasurer
DAVID CERWONKA Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
53 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in CA for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 52 → 53 over 5 years (improving by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.