Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 58 Fragile Recovery
2019 44 Fragile Recovery
2018 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 41 Fragile Recovery
2016 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARA WYLIE Secretary
NATALIE KOPPENHAVER Secretary
COLLEEN SPAGNARDI Board President
DOUG CLEMENTS Board President
JOY MOFFET Secretary
SUSAN NABORS Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LISA MORTON Secretary
JACQUE OGDEN Secretary
JAMIE BAIZE-SMITH Board President
FLORENCE BRIONES Board President
LISA STINNETT Secretary
KATHY FRYE Treasurer
LISA MORTON Secretary
JACQUE OGDEN Secretary
JAMIE BAIZE-SMITH Board President
FLORENCE BRIONES Board President
LISA STINNETT Secretary
KATHY FRYE Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 26 points below the peer median (5 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.