Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
50
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — — 50 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — — 44 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 37 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — — 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — — 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Monica Hernandez Secretary —
Megan Hillis Treasurer —
Bruce Wade Board President —
Barbara Mattick Board Member —
Gerald Buzzell Treasurer —
Robin Harkleroad Board Member —
Susan Guerard Board Member —
James Randy Miller Board President —
Joel Heppner Board Member —
Sarah Fields Board President —
Alexandra Kinnison Board President —
May Ann Mulkay Librarian —
Nancy Hess Marshall —
Sherry Wade Board President —
Brenda Peak Russell Historian —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Monica Hernandez Secretary —
Robin Harkleroad Treasurer —
Bruce Wade Board President —
Barbara Mattick Board Member —
Gerald Buzzell Board President —
Sarah Fields Board President —
Susan Guerard Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,023 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 29 points below the peer median (50 vs. 79).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.