Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
24
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2022 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 38 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 42 Fragile Recovery
2019 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 8.4% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 8.9% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 19.9% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
IOANNA KATSAROU Board President
KATERINA ALEXAKI Secretary
DEMETRI BONAROS Treasurer
IOANNA KATSAROU Board President
KATERINA ALEXAKI Secretary
DEMETRI BONAROS Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
IOANNA KATSAROU Board President
KATERINA ALEXAKI Secretary
DEMETRI BONAROS Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
24 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 26 points below the peer median (5 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 25 → 24 over 5 years (declining by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.