Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
64
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 64 Stable Stable Watch
2023 49 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 0.8% 52 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 4.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 0.6% 36 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 54 Fragile Recovery
2018 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 47 Fragile Recovery
2016 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 45 Fragile Recovery
2013 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lori Kaufman Board President
Karla LeDoux Board President
Sharon Oliver Treasurer
Christine Laaksonen Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael Polzin Treasurer 0.2% of Rev
Heidi Denysenko Board President 0.2% of Rev
Michael Polzin Treasurer 0.2% of Rev
Ashlie Keith Board President 0.2% of Rev
Gaylene Adams Secretary
Lori Kaufman Board President
Karla LeDoux Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael Polzin Treasurer 0.2% of Rev
Heidi Denysenko Board President 0.2% of Rev
Ashley Keith Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Tammy Guinee Board President
Kriss Zielinski Treasurer
Christine Hart-Myhre Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
64 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 175 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 53 points above the peer median (90 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.