Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
35
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 89 Unknown
2022 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 84 Unknown
2021 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 81 Unknown
2020 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 80 Unknown
2019 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 75 Unknown
2018 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 89 Unknown
2017 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 79 Unknown
2016 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 82 Unknown
2015 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 80 Unknown
2014 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 90 Unknown
2013 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 79 Unknown

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JIM WOODARD Board Member 807.7% of Rev
JIM WOODARD Board Member 208.0% of Rev
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 12.0% of Rev
PHILIP GLASS Board President
ARTURO BEJAR Board President
LIZBETH HASSE Treasurer
EDWARD PATUTO Secretary
GABRIELE MARY ANN SCHICKETA Board Member
KELLY SWETTE Board Member
PHILIP GLASS Board President
ARTURO BEJAR Board President
LIZBETH HASSE Treasurer
EDWARD PATUTO Secretary
GABRIELE MARY ANN SCHICKETA Board Member
KELLY SWETTE Board Member
PHILIP GLASS Board President
ARTURO BEJAR Board President
LIZBETH HASSE Treasurer
EDWARD PATUTO Secretary
GABRIELE MARY ANN SCHICKETA Board Member
KELLY SWETTE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 12.0% of Rev

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 358.3% of Rev

Tax year 2020

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 229.9% of Rev

Tax year 2019

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 856.9% of Rev

Tax year 2018

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 587.5% of Rev
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 553.6% of Rev

Tax year 2017

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 813.9% of Rev

Tax year 2016

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 399.4% of Rev

Tax year 2015

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 554.1% of Rev

Tax year 2014

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 294.0% of Rev

Tax year 2013

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 154.3% of Rev
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in CA for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

Overall score has gone from 75 → 89 over 5 years (improving by 14 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.