Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
31
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 44 Fragile Recovery
2020 40 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 35 Fragile Recovery
2016 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRITTNEY PECORE Board President
KRISSY BRANSTMA Board President
MEGAN WAITES Secretary
JENNIFER PHILLIPS Treasurer
DANIELLE LOVETTE Fundraising Cor

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CRYSTAL RUST Board President
GAYNELLE BROWN Board President
CRISSY SIMMONS Secretary
MARGARET PINEDA Treasurer
KIM MADRIL Uniform Coord.
KALIE EARNEST Uniform Coord.
HANAN WAHAAB Concert Coord.
RACHELLE RANDEEN Trip Coord.

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANICE DETAVIS Board President
CRYSTAL RUSH Secretary
SHILO VIGIL Treasurer
SALLY LANGE Fundraising
REBECCA DAHLIN Fundraising
JULIE MEYER Historian
CRYSTAL RUSH Board President
SHILO VIGIL Treasurer
REBECCA DAHLIN Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 16 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix B1.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 2 points below the peer median (30 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.