Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | 52.0% | 44 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | Hidden | Hidden | 65.2% | 36 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 41 | Financially Distressed | Decline Risk | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 43 | Financially Distressed | Decline Risk | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 43 | Financially Distressed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yara Cordeiro | Program Manager | 52.0% of Rev | ||
| Nycole Klein | Board President | — | ||
| Yara Cordeiro | Executive Director | — | ||
| Thu Do | Secretary | — | ||
| Ruth Lezama | Board Member | — | ||
| John Patton | Board Member | — | ||
| Liana Agulto | Board Member | — | ||
| Ashley Gam | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yara Cordeiro | Program Manager | 49.0% of Rev | ||
| Nycole Klein | Board President | — | ||
| Yara Cordeiro | Executive Director | — | ||
| Thu Do Riaz | Secretary | — | ||
| Ruth Lezama Charada | Board Member | — | ||
| John Patton Fosforo | Directror | — | ||
| Liana Agulto Joaninha | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 12 other orgs in MD with NTEE prefix A2.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points above the peer median (65 vs. 37).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 52.0% is well above the sector's 90th percentile (healthy band: 18–22%).
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Reduce top-officer compensation from 52.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.