Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
30
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 7.1% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 0.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 13.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 0.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 1.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 1.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 20.6% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 17.6% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 14.0% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 11.5% 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MEGAN BAKKEN Executive Director 8.5% of Rev
MARLYN LUITJENS Board Member 0.4% of Rev
KATRINA GORDON Board Member 0.3% of Rev
ERIN SHARP Board President 0.0% of Rev
CINDY KREKELBERG Board Member
HAROLD GORDON Board Member
MIKE RICHARDS Board President
ANDREW STEINHOUSE Treasurer
RANDY RUUD Board Member
MATT STEINHOUSE Board Member
ELIZABETH LOVE Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CASEY RING EXECUTIVE DI 8.3% of Rev
KATRINA GORDON Board Member 0.4% of Rev
HAROLD GORDON Board President 0.1% of Rev
MEGAN BAKKEN EXECUTIVE DI
TOMMY BAKKEN Board Member
CINDY KREKELBERG Board Member
SEAN MUELLER Board Member
MIKE RICHARDS VICE PRESIDE
RANDY RUUD Board Member
ERIN SHARP Board Member
ROB SIMMERMON Board Member
ANDREW STEINHOUSE Treasurer
SARA TEBBEN Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATRINA GORDON Board Member 0.3% of Rev
MARILYN DEN OTTER Secretary 0.1% of Rev
HAROLD GORDON Board President
JAMIE HETTWER Treasurer
CINDY KREKELBERG Board Member
JENNY VAVRA VICE PRESIDE
JANE WALSH Board Member
TERRY ZERFAS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATRINA GORDON Board Member 1.0% of Rev
MARILYN DEN OTTER SECETARY 0.4% of Rev
HAROLD GORDON Board President 0.0% of Rev
JAMIE HETTWER Treasurer
CINDY KREKELBERG Board Member
JENNY VAVRA VICE PRESIDE
JANE WALSH Board Member
TERRY ZERFAS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
30 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in SD for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.