Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
41
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — 18.3% 41 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — 23.0% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 14.6% 43 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 28.3% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — 22.7% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — 25.6% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 — — 28.0% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 — — 25.5% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2016 — — 13.5% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ryan Reardon Ex Officio 15.8% of Rev
Charlotte Sommers Business Manager 2.5% of Rev
James Bixby Board Member —
Danny McClinton Board Member —
John Barnard Treasurer —
Douglas Haynes Board Member —
Christopher Youngblood Board Member —
Andre Cholmondeley Board Member —
Linda Kendall Fields Board President —
Lockie Hunter Board Member —
Geert Bevin Board Member —
Kim Roney Secretary —
Jenna Jaffe Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ryan Reardon Ex Officio 15.1% of Rev
Charlotte Sommers Business Manager 4.7% of Rev
James Bixby Board Member —
Danny McClinton Board Member —
John Barnard Treasurer —
Douglas Haynes Board Member —
Christopher Youngblood Board Member —
Andre Cholmondeley Board Member —
Linda Kendall Fields Board President —
Lockie Hunter Board Member —
Geert Bevin Board Member —
Kim Roney Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ryan Reardon Ex Officio 12.9% of Rev
Charlotte Sommers Business Manager 4.5% of Rev
Jim Bixby Board Member —
Sally Sparks Board President —
Jason Peltz Board Member —
Danny McClinton Board Member —
John Barnard Treasurer —
Douglas Haynes Board Member —
Christopher Youngblood Board Member —
Andre Cholmondeley Board Member —
Linda Kendall Fields Board Member —
Lockie Hunter Board Member —
Kim Roney Board Member —
Tommy Seijo Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 221 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 17 points below the peer median (45 vs. 62).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.