Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
35
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 35 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 36 Fragile Recovery
2021 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 47 Fragile Recovery
2018 41 Fragile Recovery
2017 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 41 Fragile Recovery
2015 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Shannon Erb SecretaryTreasurer
Jonathan Erb Board President
Marcia Stephens Board Member
Josh Hostettler Board Member
Chris Coffelt Board Member
Tanya Coffelt Board Member
Cierra Fountain Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Shannon Erb SecretaryTreasurer
Jonathan Erb Board President
Marcia Stephens Board Member
Josh Hostettler Board Member
Chris Coffelt Board Member
Tanya Coffelt Board Member
Cierra Fountain Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Shannon Erb SecretaryTreasurer
Jonathan Erb Board President
Kathy Akers Board President
Marcia Stephens Board Member
Mary Ruth Horn Board Member
Shane Akers Board Member
Chris Coffelt Board Member
Tanya Coffelt Board Member
Cierra Clark Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 85 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 15 points below the peer median (15 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.