Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 10.1% 52 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — 19.3% 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 23.1% 45 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2021 — — 35.3% 37 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 — — 17.4% 47 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 26.4% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAREN ROHRER Executive Director 6.9% of Rev
MARTIN SCHALLER Executive Director 2.4% of Rev
JOHN IANNITELLO Treasurer 0.9% of Rev
DENISE KITZEROW Board President —
JEFF BRANDENBURG Board President —
ERIC NYCZ Board President —
AMY ELDER Board Member —
BARB SCHWEITZER Board Member —
GINGER SNYDER-VAN ELLS Board Member —
MATT WALLANDER Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAREN ROHRER Executive Director 10.4% of Rev
MARTIN SCHALLER Board Member —
SUSAN BROWN Board Member —
JEFF BRANDENBURG Board Member —
DENISE KITZEROW Board Member —
GINGER VAN ELLS Board Member —
JONATHAN MEDENDORP Board Member —
DOUG ODELL Board President —
JOHN IANNITELLO Treasurer —
ERIC NYCZ Board President —
RICHARD LADWIG Secretary —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAREN ROHRER Executive Director 9.9% of Rev
ERIC NYCZ Board Member —
RICHARD LADWIG Board Member —
LUAN LEONARDELLI Board Member —
DOUG ODELL Board Member —
SUSAN BROWN Board Member —
JEFF BRANDENBURG Board Member —
DENISE KITZEROW Board Member —
MARTIN SCHALLER Board President —
JAMIE VERGENZ Board President —
JOHN IANNITELLO Treasurer —
WARREN SCHMIDT Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAREN ROHRER Executive Director 8.6% of Rev
KAREN ROHRER Executive Director 8.6% of Rev
MARTIN SCHALLER Board President —
JAMIE VERGENZ Board President —
WARREN SCHMIDT Secretary —
JEFF BRANDENBURG Board Member —
LUAN LEONARDELI Board Member —
DOUG ODELL Board Member —
ERIC NYCZ Board Member —
JOHN IANNITELLO Treasurer —
DENISE KITZEROW Board Member —
RICHARD LADWIG Board Member —
MARTIN SCHALLER Board President —
SUSAN SHAW Board President —
WARREN SCHMIDT Secretary —
BRITTANY SCHUH-VANDERWEELE Treasurer —
JEFF BRANDENBURG Board Member —
JULIE DEAN GROSSMAN Board Member —
ANGELIN LAURIN Board Member —
ERIC NYCZ Board Member —
JOHN IANNITELLO Board Member —
JAMIE VERGENZ Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 32 points above the peer median (60 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.