Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Stabilization

What does this mean?

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

The Path Forward

The Dawn

Institutionalizes the emergency protocols that saved the organization. It locks in new, rigorous governance policies to prevent a relapse into crisis.

The Dawn
The Dawn
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Stabilization
Overall
34
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Acute Stabilization

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 2.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 11.4% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 43.8% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 12.5% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 0.8% 51 Fragile Recovery
2016 6.2% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 9.5% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 13.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Charles Dickerson Board Member 2.7% of Rev
Akilah Morgan Office Manager 2.4% of Rev
Charles Dickerson Board Member 1.9% of Rev
Akilah Morgan Office Manager 1.8% of Rev
Jonathan Weedman Consultant 1.0% of Rev
Jonathan Weedman Consultant 0.9% of Rev
J Stanley Sanders ESQ Chairman
Sandra Wheeler Scretary
Sandra G Bennett Board Member
Hansonia Caldwall Board Member
Anne-Marie Johnson Board Member
James Montgomary Board Member
Jazin Morales Board Member
Wilma Pinder Board Member
Marcus Smith Board Member
Earl Wooten Board Member
J Stanley Sanders ESQ Chairman
Sandra Wheeler Scretary
Sandra G Bennett Board Member
Hansonia Caldwall Board Member
Anne-Marie Johnson Board Member
James Montgomary Board Member
Jazin Morales Board Member
Wilma Pinder Board Member
Marcus Smith Board Member
Earl Wooten Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 36 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 34 points below the peer median (0 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Acute Stabilization

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

Overall score has gone from 51 → 34 over 5 years (declining by 17 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.