Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
43
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 20.2% 43 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 7.8% 49 Fragile Recovery
2021 Hidden Hidden 19.5% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 56.8% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 12.8% 47 Fragile Recovery
2018 12.6% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 14.8% 48 Fragile Recovery
2016 8.9% 48 Fragile Recovery
2015 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 49 Fragile Recovery
2012 18 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAROLINA THOR Executive Director 23.2% of Rev
BRIAN DUGGAN Board President
SUSAN KAMINSKI Board President
RENATO BACCHI Treasurer
JANIS PEREIRA Secretary
HARVEY DANIELS Board Member
BRIAN JEFFE Board Member
ALYSSA HANNA FALARSKI Board Member
CARLA SMITH NASH Board Member
PAUL O'NEILL Board Member
SEAN SEBASTIAN Board Member
ALEX SIMAKAS Board Member
ALEXIS CORRY KAPPEL Board Member
LINDSAY FOUSE-HOPKINS Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAROLINA THOR Executive Director 22.6% of Rev
BRIAN DUGGAN Board President
SUSAN KAMINSKI Board President
RENATO BACCHI Treasurer
JANIS PEREIRA Secretary
HARVEY DANIELS Board Member
MATTHEW DIANDRETH Board Member
BRIAN JEFFE Board Member
ALYSSA HANNA FALARSKI Board Member
CARLA SMITH NASH Board Member
PAUL O'NEILL Board Member
SEAN SEBASTIAN Board Member
ALEX SIMAKAS Board Member
ALEXIS CORRY KAPPEL Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAROLINA THOR Executive Director 23.2% of Rev
BRIAN DUGGAN Board President
SUSAN KAMINSKI Board President
RENATO BACCHI Treasurer
JANIS PEREIRA Secretary
SARAH AHMAD WILSON Board Member
NATALIE BOUCHARD Board Member
HARVEY DANIELS Board Member
MATTHEW DIANDRETH Board Member
BRIAN JEFFE Board Member
ALYSSA HANNA FALARSKI Board Member
PAULO NZAMBI Board Member
CARLA SMITH NASH Board Member
PAUL O'NEILL Board Member
SEAN SEBASTIAN Board Member
ALEX SIMAKAS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.