Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
54
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 54 Fragile Recovery
2023 55 Fragile Recovery
2022 56 Fragile Recovery
2021 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 58 Fragile Recovery
2019 55 Fragile Recovery
2018 35 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 55 Fragile Recovery
2016 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 51 Fragile Recovery
2014 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NICHOLAS SOUTHWICK Board President
TERRI L MURPHY Treasurer
MARTHA TASSINARI Secretary
LOURDES POMERANTZ Board Member
KIMBERLY VAN TWUYVER Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHELLE BOYLE Board President
WENLONG TANG Treasurer
CAROLINE ODDEN Secretary
KIMBERLY VAN TWUYVER Board Member
LYNNE ELLIS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MELISSA GINSBURG Board President
LISA AMANDA MINKKINEN NOVACK Treasurer
CAROLINE ODDEN Secretary
JENNIFER DUMOUCHEL Board Member
MICHELLE BOYLE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points above the peer median (65 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.