Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
16
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 45.5% 16 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 36.7% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 3.6% 38 Fragile Recovery
2019 4.7% 40 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 8.6% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 10.7% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 3.7% 46 Fragile Recovery
2015 19.7% 43 Fragile Recovery
2014 29.4% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 19.2% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GIA EMORY Treasurer 6.5% of Rev
RON EMORY Board Member 6.5% of Rev
MIKI SLECHTA Board Member
ERIKA NEWTON Board Member
JAY DENNE Board Member
CY CHESTERMAN Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Miki Slechta Board Member
Erika Newton Board Member
Jay Denne Board Member
Cy Chesterman Board Member
Gia Emory Treasurer
Ron Emory Board Member
Miki Slechta Board Member
Erika Newton Board Member
Jay Denne Board Member
Cy Chesterman Board Member
Gia Emory Treasurer
Ron Emory Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Miki Slechta Board Member
Erika Newton Board Member
Jay Denne Board Member
Cy Chesterman Board Member
Gia Emory Treasurer
Ron Emory Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
16 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 85 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 39 points below the peer median (0 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 45.5% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.