Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
39
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 33.8% 39 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2022 — — 15.2% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 — — 19.9% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 — — 20.7% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 — — 17.3% 46 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 43 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 — — — 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2016 — — — 43 Fragile Gov Risk
2015 — — 7.8% 49 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 8.4% 45 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 13.6% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 — — 8.4% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — 5.3% 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELLEN FENNER Executive Director 33.8% of Rev
PAT SCHWAN Board President —
CRAIG ERAAS Board President —
SUSAN PODYGULA Board Member —
MICHAEL HEIL Treasurer —
JOY-NICOLE SMITH Board Member —
MICHELLE BASSLER Board Member —
ANN CADWALADER Board Member —
PAULETTE DAILEY Board Member —
JESSICA EGGE Board Member —
DIANE LAUTT Board Member —
JOHN JERMIASON Board Member —
PAM JUNDT Board Member —
KELI ROSELLI-SULLIVAN Board Member —
LAURIE VERBITSKY Board Member —
TONIA VITKO Board Member —
DUSTY ZIMMERMAN Secretary —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELLEN FENNER Executive Director 30.0% of Rev
CHRISTINE BAUMANN Board President —
SHERI LIEN Board Member —
MICHAEL HEIL Treasurer —
SUSAN PODRYGULA Secretary —
PAULETTE DAILEY Board Member —
SHANNA LUCY Board Member —
JOHN JERMIASON Board Member —
PAT SCHWAN Board President —
DUSTY ZIMMERMAN Board Member —
LAURIE VERBITSKY Board Member —
PAM ONDRACEK Board Member —
MICHELLE BASSLER Board Member —
V LEROY CHAUSSE Board Member —
ABBY WALKER GASKILL Board Member —
CRAIG ERAAS Board Member —
EVAN LOOSEN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELLEN FENNER Executive Director 23.5% of Rev
CHRISTINE BAUMANN Board President —
SHERI LIEN Board Member —
MICHAEL HEIL Treasurer —
SUSAN PODRYGULA Secretary —
PAULETTE DAILEY Board Member —
SHANNA LUCY Board Member —
JOHN JERMIASON Board Member —
PAT SCHWAN Board President —
DUSTY ZIMMERMAN Board Member —
LAURIE VERBITSKY Board Member —
PAM ONDRACEK Board Member —
MICHELLE BASSLER Board Member —
V LEROY CHAUSSE Board Member —
ABBY WALKER GASKILL Board Member —
CRAIG ERAAS Board Member —
EVAN LOOSEN Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELLEN FENNER Executive Director 20.3% of Rev
CHRISTINE BAUMANN Board President —
SHERI LIEN Board Member —
MICHAEL HEIL Treasurer —
SUSAN PODRYGULA Secretary —
PAULETTE DAILEY Board Member —
SHANNA LUCY Board Member —
JOHN JERMIASON Board Member —
JOHN WARNER Board President —
JERI LANGEMO Board Member —
BONNY KEMPER Board Member —
LAURIE VERBITSKY Board Member —
RANDAL MITSCHKE Board Member —
MICHELLE BASSLER Board Member —
V LEROY CHAUSSE Board Member —
ABBY WALKER GASKILL Board Member —
NICK WELLS Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 23 other orgs in ND with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 14 points below the peer median (42 vs. 56).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 33.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~24 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.