Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 50 Fragile Recovery
2023 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 46 Fragile Recovery
2021 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 61 Stable Stable Watch
2012 61 Stable Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREW TREUNER Board President
DON LUPER Board President
JOE FISCHER Treasurer
JULIE WHITE Secretary
KAREN ELLEBRACHT Board Member
VICKI WEAVER Board Member
JAN BAHNER Board Member
APRIL PROVANCE Board Member
RACHEL KRAMER Board Member
CARL HUTCHERSON Board Member
CHELSEA KEHDE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREW TREUNER Board President
DON LUPER Board President
JOE FISCHER Treasurer
GENA SWEARINGEN Secretary
KAREN ELLEBRACHT Board Member
VICKI WEAVER Board Member
JAN BAHNER Board Member
RHIANNON FOSTER Board Member
BEN JACKSON Board Member
CHANISTY LAMBERT Board Member
RUTH HART Board Member
JULIE WHITE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 27 other orgs in MO with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 50 → 50 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.