Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
33
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 40 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — — 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — — 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Luke Menard Executive Director 11.8% of Rev
Kristine Brown Executive Director —
Wendy Youngblood Board President —
Art Hale Dr Board Member —
Josh Bolden Board Member —
Roger Winegar Board Member —
Lori Best Secretary —
Josh Silvy Board President —
Ellen Nesbitt Treasurer —
Lisa Murphy Board Member —
Justin Ables Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Luke Menard Executive Director 3.0% of Rev
Josh Bolden Board Member —
Roxanne Amundsen Board Member —
Rick Uebel Board Member —
Ellen Nesbitt Board Member —
Justin Ables Board Member —
Loran Polson Board Member —
Lorie Best Board Member —
Lisa Murphy Board Member —
Kristine Brown Board President —
Art Hale Dr Board Member —
Dean Donat Board Member —
Josh Silvy Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEAN DONAT Board Member —
KYLE BLANCHARD Board Member —
JOSH BOULDEN Board Member —
JUSTIN ABLES Board Member —
LORAN POLSON Board Member —
MARY JO GREEN Board Member —
ART HALE Board Member —
LISA MURPHY DURECTIR —
ROXANNE AMUNDSEN Board Member —
MADELINE ALLIN Board Member —
LORIE BEST Board President —
JOSH SILVY Secretary —
KIM HALE Board President —
RICK UEBEL Treasurer —
JAMES BARBER Executive Director —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NICK BATEY Board Member —
KYLE BLANCHARD Board Member —
BARBARA WALKER Board Member —
KRISTINE BROWN Board Member —
JUSTIN ABLES Board Member —
DARLA HOWEL Board Member —
ART HALE Board Member —
MCRAY HILL DURECTIR —
ROXANNE AMUNDSEN Board Member —
MADELINE ALLIN Board Member —
LORIE BEST Board President —
KIM HALE Board President —
RICK UEBEL Treasurer —
JOSH SILVY Secretary —
JAMES BARBER Executive Director —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NICK BATEY Board Member —
LEA TRIMBLE Board Member —
BARBARA WALKER Board Member —
KRISTINE BROWN Board Member —
JUSTIN ABLES Board Member —
DARLA HOWEL Board Member —
ART HALE Board Member —
MCRAY HILL DURECTIR —
LISA MURPHY Board Member —
MADELINE ALLIN Board Member —
LORIE BEST Board President —
KIM HALE Board President —
RICK UEBEL Treasurer —
JOHN SILVY Secretary —
JAMES BARBER Executive Director —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 93 other orgs in MO with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 55 points below the peer median (10 vs. 65).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.