Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
36
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 38.3% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 14.9% 39 Fragile Recovery
2021 19.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 17.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 8.3% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 18.5% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 21.2% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 23.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 12.1% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 24.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 20.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 21.2% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 22.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Rachel Tibbetts Artistic Director 18.8% of Rev
John Wolbers Executive Director 18.8% of Rev
Lisa Durkin Board President
Cassidy Flynn Board President
Andrea Lubershane Treasurer
Jocelyn Matsuo Secretary
Courtney Everett Board Member
Mark Holly Board Member
Steven Knight Board Member
Matthew Mahaffey Board Member
Karen Meyer Board Member
Tim Mooney Board Member
Kevin Windhauser PhD Board Member
Phil Woodmore PhD Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
John Wolbers Executive Director 13.5% of Rev
Steven Knight Board President
Jocelyn Matsuo Board President
Paige Colon Secretary
Matthew Mahaffey Treasurer
Edgar Evans Board Member
Jami Dolby Board Member
Evan Kuhn Board Member
Tara A Nealey PhD Board Member
Phil Woodmore PhD Board Member
Lisa Cohn Durkin Board Member
Mark Holly Board Member
Tim Mooney Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Shannon Durio Executive Director 15.9% of Rev
Steven Knight Board President
April Foster Board President
Melinda Ligon Secretary
Jami Dolby Board Member
Edgar Evans Board Member
Chris Harris Board Member
Evan Kuhn Board Member
George Lombardi Board Member
Matthew Mahaffey Board Member
Jocelyn Matsuo Board Member
Tara A Nealey PhD Board Member
Gina T Savoie Esq Board Member
Phil Woodmore PhD Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 105 other orgs in MO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 15 points above the peer median (45 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 38.3% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~33 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.