Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
33
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 28.8% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 46 Fragile Recovery
2019 49 Fragile Recovery
2018 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 53 Fragile Recovery
2016 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 55 Fragile Recovery
2012 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATTHEW CLEMMONS ADMIN ASST 24.5% of Rev
SHAUNNA WOOD Board President
CARRIN KETCHUM Board President
KATHY CHINN Secretary
HOPE WYMAN Treasurer
LISA THOMAS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT BLAIR Board President
LEON WALLBRICK Board President
ANGELA ROQUET MOTHERSBAUGH Secretary
HOPE WYMAN Treasurer
KENDRA SHIELDS Board Member
MORGAN MOFFITT ADMIN ASST
TIFFINI HENVILLE Board Member
KATHY CHINN Board Member
EMILY MENSENDIEK Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 27 other orgs in MO with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 18 points below the peer median (15 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 46 → 33 over 5 years (declining by 13 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.