Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
33
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 17.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 14.5% 45 Fragile Recovery
2021 21.3% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 21.8% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 13.4% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 45 Fragile Recovery
2017 28.0% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2016 25.9% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2015 14.2% 39 Fragile Recovery
2014 25.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 27.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 30.0% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 47.3% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DONALD LONCASTY EXECUTIVE DI 17.7% of Rev
SCOTT FRANCIS Board Member
TRUDY GABRIEL Board Member
TROY LILLEBO Board Member
JIM BLAIR Secretary
SCOTT BOSWELL Board President
JONATHAN THOMAS Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DONALD LONCASTY EXECUTIVE DI 15.4% of Rev
DONALD LONCASTY Executive Director 14.7% of Rev
SCOTT FRANCIS Board Member
TRUDY GABRIEL Board Member
TROY LILLEBO Board Member
URSULA TERRASI Board Member
JIM BLAIR Secretary
SCOTT BOSWELL Board President
JONATHAN THOMAS Treasurer
SCOTT BOSWELL Board President
NANCY THIESSEN Board President
JIM BLAIR Secretary
SCOTT FRANCIS Board Member
URSULA TERRASI Treasurer
TROY LILLEBO Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DONALD LONCASTY Executive Director 16.8% of Rev
SCOTT BOSWELL Board President
NANCY THIESSEN Board President
JIM BLAIR Secretary
SCOTT FRANCIS Board Member
URSULA TERRASI Treasurer
TROY LILLEBO Board Member
MISSY WHEELER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 105 other orgs in MO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points below the peer median (15 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.