Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 10.0% 54 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 10.1% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 11.1% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — 10.4% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — — 52 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — — 48 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 42 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — — 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — 3.7% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — 9.2% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 — — 7.8% 44 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LESLIE FORRESTER EXECUTIVE DI 8.0% of Rev
SUSAN BELCHER Board Member —
KAYLA BELL Treasurer —
MEGAN BUCHBINDER Board President —
JIM BULTAS VICE PRESIDE —
ASHLEY DAVIS Board Member —
JILL GREGORY Board Member —
MIKE HOLMES Board Member —
JOSH INMAN Board Member —
EMLYN JOHNSON Board Member —
ELLEN NEVILLE-VERDUGO Board Member —
MATT NOBLETT Board Member —
ERIC OLSON Board Member —
BETTY PARNELL Board Member —
COURTNEY PINKHAM-MARTIN Secretary —
ALLIN SORENSON Board Member —
NATHAN SUTTON Board Member —
SHAWN WAHL Board Member —
KEVIN WATERLAND Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LESLIE FORRESTER EXECUTIVE DI 7.4% of Rev
SALLY BAIRD Board Member —
SUSAN BELCHER Board Member —
KAYLA BELL Treasurer —
MEGAN BUCHBINDER Secretary —
JIM BULTAS Board Member —
JEFF CUMLEY Board Member —
LAURA JEAN DERRICK Board Member —
CHUCK DOW Board Member —
MARTY GOODNIGHT Board Member —
JANN HOLLAND Board Member —
JAMES JEFFRIES Board Member —
COREY KILBURN Board Member —
CYNTHIA LIPSCOMB Board Member —
ELLEN NEVILLE-VERDUGO Board Member —
MATT NOBLETT Board Member —
BETTY PARNELL Board Member —
JUSTIN PETERSBURG VICE PRESIDE —
COURTNEY PINKHAM-MARTIN Board Member —
KARA REMINGTON Board Member —
ALLIN SORENSON Board President —
NATHAN SUTTON Board Member —
SHAWN WAHL Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LESLIE FORRESTER EXECUTIVE DI 7.6% of Rev
KAT ALLIE Board Member —
SALLY BAIRD Board Member —
SUSAN BELCHER Board Member —
JOSHUA BEST Board President —
MEGAN BUCHBINDER Board Member —
JIM BULTAS Board Member —
JEFF CUMLEY Board Member —
LAURA JEAN DERRICK Board Member —
CHUCK DOW Board Member —
RACHEL ELSBERRY Treasurer —
MARTY GOODNIGHT PAST-PRESIDE —
JAMES GORST Board Member —
JANN HOLLAND Board Member —
COREY KILBURN Board Member —
WINTER KINNE Board Member —
TESSA LEROY Board Member —
CYNTHIA LIPSCOMB Board Member —
BETTY PARNELL Board Member —
JUSTIN PETERSBURG Secretary —
KARA REMINGTON Board Member —
ALLIN SORENSON VICE PRESIDE —
SHAWN WAHL Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 161 other orgs in MO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 30 points above the peer median (60 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 52 → 54 over 5 years (improving by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.