Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2023 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 54 Fragile Recovery
2021 48 Fragile Recovery
2020 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 57 Fragile Recovery
2018 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 53 Fragile Recovery
2016 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 51 Fragile Recovery
2013 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ASHLEY BRANSTETTER Board President
MARY LANG FOURNIER VICE PRESIDE
PAMELA BROWN Secretary
WALTER LOGAN Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ASHLEY BRANSTETTER Board President
MARY LANG FOURNIER VICE PRESIDE
PAMELA BROWN Secretary
WALTER LOGAN Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JUDITH BRUCE Board President
ASHLEY BRANSTETTER VICE PRESIDE
DEBBIE SULLIVAN Secretary
WALTER LOGAN Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 27 other orgs in MO with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 39 points above the peer median (65 vs. 26).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 36 → 51 over 5 years (improving by 15 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.