Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
41
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 36.9% 41 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2022 16.2% 44 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 17.5% 44 Fragile Recovery
2020 16.8% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 16.4% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2018 13.9% 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 6.6% 50 Fragile Recovery
2016 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 57 Fragile Recovery
2013 55 Fragile Recovery
2012 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEFFREY PHILLIPS Executive Director 18.7% of Rev
JASON EDWARDS FUNDRAISING COORDINATOR 15.7% of Rev
ROBERT MCCONNELL Board Member 2.5% of Rev
CHRISTINE BERGAN Board President
JOHN DODGE Treasurer
RODNEY BOTTS Board President
KEITH SCHULZ Board President
SYDNEY GERST Treasurer
MARY BROCKMAN Secretary
MARCIA KENTNER Board President
ED KROPA Secretary
JUDY CHURCH Treasurer
ELIZABETH STOLTZ-PETERS Secretary
JEAN THOMSON Board President
LISA JENNISON Board President
LILLIAN CURTIS Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEFFREY PHILLIPS Executive Director 10.9% of Rev
ROBERT MCCONNELL Board Member 2.5% of Rev
ED KROPA Board President
JUDY CHURCH Treasurer
ELIZABETH STOLTZ-PETERS Secretary
JEAN THOMSON Secretary
LISA JENNISON Board President
STEPHEN CAMPBELL Board President
PAUL DENNISON Board President
CARL MOEHLMAN Secretary
JOHN DODGE Treasurer
RODNEY BUTTS Board President
KEITH SCHULZ Board President
SYDNEY GERST Treasurer
MARY BROCKMAN Secretary
MARCIA KENTNER Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEFFREY PHILLIPS Executive Director 10.9% of Rev
ROBERT MCCONNELL Board Member 2.5% of Rev
STEPHEN CAMPBELL Board President
JOHN RIESSEN Board President
CARL MOEHLMAN Secretary
JOHN DODGE Treasurer
LISA JENNISON Board President
ROONEY BOTTS Board President
SYDNEY GERST Treasurer
MARY BROCKMAN Secretary
MARCIA KENTNER Board President
ED KROPA Board President
JUDY CHURCH Treasurer
ELIZABETH STOLTZ-PETERS Secretary
JEAN THOMSON Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 86 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 16 points above the peer median (45 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 36.9% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~30 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.