Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 48 Fragile Recovery
2022 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 49 Fragile Recovery
2020 27.4% 38 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 49 Fragile Recovery
2015 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 45 Fragile Recovery
2013 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KRISTI BECKER Secretary
KATHY KLOCKE Board Member
JAN MUHL Board President
SARAH PINION DIRECTORY
DICK SHERRARD Board Member
HEATHER WAACK Treasurer
JACK WILLEY VICE PRESIDE
RICHARD HALL EXECUTIVE DI
KRISTI BECKER Board Member
RICHARD HALL EXECUTIVE DI
JAN MUHL Board President
JAN MUNDT Secretary
ELIZABETH WEBER Treasurer
JACK WILLEY Board Member
LAVONNE WILLIAMS Board Member
BOB WINEGAR VICE PRESIDE

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RICHARD HALL Board Member 19.4% of Rev
JAN MUNDT Board Member
BOB WINEGAR Board Member
VICKI WING Board Member
KATHY KLOCKE Board President
LUANN HUCKSTADT Secretary
DICK SHERRARD Board President
JOHN FRANZEN Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 8 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 26 points above the peer median (45 vs. 19).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.